Obama’s Net Spending Cut Promise

This Monday the Treasury Department released the 2008 Financial Report of the United States Government. According to the report, while government revenues stayed relatively flat, increasing only 1%, the government’s net operating cost more than tripled from the prior fiscal year. The report also warns: “In both the near and long term [funding the Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid] programs will account for a large and growing portion of total government spending. The projected long-term costs are much greater than the resources that will be available to pay for them, particularly as health care costs continue to rise and the population continues to age.”

Lost in all the recent talk about $1 trillion stimulus spending by the next administration, is a promise President-elect Barack Obama made to the American people on October 7th of this year. Speaking in front of a live national audience Obama said: “So we’re going to have to make some investments, but we’ve also got to make spending cuts. And what I’ve proposed, you’ll hear Sen. McCain say, well, he’s proposing a whole bunch of new spending, but actually I’m cutting more than I’m spending so that it will be a net spending cut.” Obama is hardly the first President to promise rein in spending, but very few have actually kept their promise to the American people. We sincerely hope Obama can change that practice. To that end the Heritage Foundation offers the following guidelines to help Obama meet his net spending cut promise:

  • Take the Promise Seriously: Lawmakers are already using the recession as an excuse to dust off old spending wish lists and dubiously call them “stimulus” bills. With the 2009 projected budget deficit already approaching $1 trillion, additional “stimulus” spending would be unaffordable, not to mention ineffective in rescuing the economy. In this rush to expand government, cooler heads must prevail. Priority-setting and trade-offs are more important than ever, and your promise of a net spending cut must stand in the way of an unaffordable spending hike.
  • Define ‘Net Spending Cut’: Campaign promises are often based on slippery rhetoric and accounting, so it is important to define “net spending cut” precisely and publicly. Obama should simply define “net spending cut” as what it means in layman’s terms to the millions of Americans who heard your pledge: Washington spending fewer total nominal dollars next year than this year. Any redefinition would justifiably be seen by many voters as nothing more than another misleading campaign promise.
  • Cut Farm Subsidies: The first place to look for spending offsets should be farm subsidies–America’s largest corporate welfare program. Taxpayers spend $25 billion annually on farm subsidies, the majority of which are granted to commercial farmers, who also report an average income of $200,000 and an average net worth of $2 million. Over 90 percent of all farm subsidies goes to growers of just five crops: wheat, cotton, corn, soybeans, and rice. Just as producers of fruits, vegetables, beef, and poultry currently thrive without subsidies, so can other farmers.
  • Use PAYGO to Prevent Expensive New Entitlements: The 110th Congress reinstated Pay-As-You-Go (PAYGO) rules requiring that new entitlement expansions or tax cuts be deficit-neutral. They have since ignored it. Obama pledged to make PAYGO a centerpiece of his budget agenda. For PAYGO truly to help government live within its means–and for Obama to fulfill his promise of a net spending cut–Obama must use it as a tool to offset expansions of entitlement programs with equal reductions in existing entitlements. This is more responsible than dismissing PAYGO whenever it becomes an inconvenient impediment to new spending.

When announcing the nomination of Peter Orszag to head the Office of Management and Budget, Obama expanded on his fiscal discipline pledge by stating that “budget reform is not an option. It’s a necessity,” and that federal budgeting would require “tough choices. There are just going to be some programs that simply don’t work and we’ve got to eliminate them.” Heritage looks forward to helping Obama keep his net spending cut promise.

Quick Hits:

Found on Heritage Foundation Foundry

About these ads

Leave a comment

Filed under Heritage.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s